本帖最後由 豬農 於 2014-1-18 13:23 編輯
7 L; j' S0 N( }1 j4 _2 f3 B, H- @, x
除非我理解錯了盧鬆鬆的話,但我認為小盧對Matt Cutts所說的東西沒有正確理解,並且是理解相反了。(這裡暫且不論 Cutts是否撒謊,這個是另一個常見話題)。
8 j- T- t3 z6 {5 Y1 E# u) ^, _& S# }; w
如下是SEL對Cutts是如何回答這個問題的英文描述,及附上YT視頻一個。
9 e- [+ z8 b2 b9 N% N3 o
4 Y. G2 Y* X+ N0 Z) s3 ]The question was, 「Are results in different positions ranked by different algorithms?」 問題是,谷歌是否對不同的排名位置使用不同的算法?
, C" X4 j% n5 N8 K* }8 z# ]& @5 E3 J; k. ^
The answer is NO, Google does NOT have reserved web search results slots or positions for ranking for specific algorithms. 谷歌不會對搜索結果的不同位置使用不同的算法。
0 d. h$ v+ i( N( ?
& k( d8 v6 ?( gFor example, slots 3-5 in the results are NOT reserved for fresher content, while slots 6-8 are not reserved for more authoritative content. It does NOT work like that. Google has algorithms that ranks all the search results and the algorithms are NOT assigned to specific positions. 谷歌算法從排名位置1到n都是一樣的。
% n2 V1 Y1 W+ s7 b1 x* o# [; f( f, d4 \ b8 z2 b. K. g
英文視頻: http://www.youtube.com/embed/6dlr-1Qk8Uc?rel=0" \) |# n0 ]* \/ |- l
) X- T2 Q6 h" z0 R* g) n6 i
對於無法上youtube的,這裡為方便大家給出他在視頻裡說的詳細內容(不要介意少量錯字):
p! r: { F w3 s- S) ^" X
3 j S& Q i4 x% @In general, the rankings are not different for positions 1 to 3, and 4 to 6 and 7 through 10. It's the same algorithm that returns lots of different web results, you know a hundred or even a thousand and then with those we just sort them in the order of what we think the trade-off of relevancy versus reputation, so we want something that's very relevant, but also as reputable as we can find. So it's the same algorithm that generates all those sorted lists of results and that shows up on the first page, So for the most part for web ranking it's not the case where position number nine is saved for things based on backlinks or anything like that. It's the same algorithm that's generating the same list of search results.
/ T x$ d! E2 s( M9 `2 W
0 C; y3 @4 o- _# ?: n
: ]2 y) G% ?5 F- }/ o& e2 Z4 S |