本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
( v- M- b) L: e6 |9 ]& ^
7 [6 x0 c' ~$ n; ` D3 a不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
+ `6 X2 B" f5 ?- U4 y+ C3 ~7 ?" A; N
5 ~2 g8 t3 [3 ^/ k對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說+ j p. S% a# r+ [
: M# b* {" h2 a6 J/ FJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
q* o, d. p: Z" d+ \# O/ W: B n- c
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.6 b4 ^2 W- V& y8 L
; w1 ]/ j" c% C' h8 D" X L+ ZRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.4 u: G! t6 w% c2 G. ]8 n6 J
& g4 v0 z& ?( @2 B- cSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
; u: T0 G! q: q
- x0 {# F" J, ]* h5 WMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
% U0 E3 K4 f" V( G9 K* B' R; g! S# q; q7 a8 [
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。. o* L% p( Z' {) @' A+ R9 z
2 e! G& c; _, |- a$ m0 r
# N- ^! ^- ]& B4 ?8 Z" a* ?! w) ~ E' H' W! F5 N3 u! N
* _. R3 P5 f# F/ G
% f& h4 U" J# ^2 Q0 Y$ k |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
