本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
+ ~; I( ?2 k" w& r% B! b4 C/ }$ z! Y9 B( F2 X) J7 v
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
/ k# E2 R R# y) V$ ^1 x
; f) p, ~0 j+ l% N" b; a對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
9 O+ a( y) c8 I; O6 w6 F5 d6 V6 j' ^+ q) m( A+ |7 V
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
$ g4 T# H8 v$ z- h他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：2 t) i2 X( x0 }' p
4 O8 d; o+ R* r& QIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
: d7 Z$ {0 i' I7 f7 F
8 E3 e5 w0 s' v# RRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content. U/ L0 B7 H' Y5 Z
2 }8 ^0 N% ]3 A7 OSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
$ k: D6 o, k/ [" K K7 s9 m: W2 Z9 l3 D: ^7 Q9 ? `: }' u
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
+ h/ c8 I. e! c; f# T3 y順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
1 w+ l. F! A( a }2 ]7 w+ S; E- G/ j
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
2 Z4 j& ?3 {5 T. J, h2 @- H- H5 E: @/ u A$ Z4 O
. u/ b+ q- l% _0 Z M* l
) Q, O* V0 z% t" \0 \. R9 j1 i2 K) s1 Q Z5 ^
- O7 T y; @2 P# l5 f+ |; j
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
