本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 + _. W" Z5 o- j8 ^: P
) Y( v! V0 S/ D7 c9 F! S) b
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） $ l* R* }: O( T' v
& O8 W, ^3 ~/ Y1 i& v" u
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
$ Y9 k7 U8 B2 C' u7 {0 a0 Z. ^5 `* p' y1 I9 Q- d2 `
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：4 X: {# y" _; A0 ?9 j( F! Y9 S
9 Q, n, f7 _, d$ @
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.- p" O- v& |1 `3 J8 ]4 B6 [
$ p1 w9 \; F9 u4 ~% T1 p" y9 J
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
( P# F5 B7 m2 f, P, ? ^7 }
" {' n6 c: k. u3 ~4 PSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.- t1 w, I0 D1 U
7 x( {8 l) W) J( H
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
. i {4 A, V! Z: `, L! t7 J順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。. Q! U0 x* o" m: d+ s
, z, f2 ]4 w$ e3 H
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
0 z) i Q; A" j" q1 n5 G4 B# r }8 |5 d0 O1 q5 t/ W# D- U8 M9 j
, E9 R- i. p* S+ d
4 D) y1 j3 k$ }7 N) g6 [: I- c
) X# U$ _) O2 `" w' j0 v5 `) p
. `- n y0 p. i/ \4 [( [" ]! U* x |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
