本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
2 [6 I: n; Y4 E* n) R5 g& o9 }& H: ]! j7 l
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） - u* H6 n$ [* a! h) l O+ h
; s$ }2 I, T' Y& Z; E! g
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說; b5 P A1 A: l9 q
( b/ _, a [5 l& p4 {Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：( w$ u7 U, [5 v+ V6 h
) {8 Q% u% K2 E3 M8 z( [
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.1 v! V0 ?/ B6 b# y7 k$ p
9 k5 G% k8 m* J+ s! O
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
* c! J9 p& M) L! C) ]$ r- n8 u R
, b, L4 @& `9 C1 F! t. E, k3 ~Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.& _9 T" M; a* o
% l3 u5 R" I7 q* L
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
7 W6 R' r& x7 {6 {5 K- f/ |+ I' l' q4 t
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。7 o* {3 J- ]) D7 b! Y
% {) u% R+ g9 @ h# W! F# y: [; E4 C
6 `3 }3 c5 K0 p
9 D! G7 U. v% q* h2 n5 U+ J$ Y7 w' V& q4 F! Z
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
