本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
9 z, E5 l; @+ r+ P
0 L0 |( _3 [5 X$ \不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
; c) N9 @( s" Q0 Z4 z. [# S7 v1 s8 d5 f" S* F& c
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說& z3 R9 f- ^ e5 M" }; J
9 ?' O. ~3 j* J6 K: ~! X9 E* `1 w
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
) {+ _, H% c* _ E; A$ W他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：7 O+ w q) {& S! t6 l4 {
" T& ]- I; [9 B$ e. f+ u# V( Q: sIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.. y& W7 |, w% E8 g% _) e4 N2 H) I9 ?
/ ?: U7 O" v, A9 }1 ?4 z/ @4 `Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
. t4 R* p. H/ C. D X/ W; l+ B& M8 H9 m9 j6 V" e4 i* c
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.& }: P( d- _3 u& b3 e8 h
# b/ J$ B' n kMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。. W$ ?6 D/ U. Q# {; d+ l
" R2 j# R/ @0 b6 L/ L+ d; J; M因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
2 P7 J6 }- u7 a! J+ @( w7 ?8 r$ J; K" S+ G! e+ B5 |" v
( K3 f) k, S# @" z* c' r/ I
; F' m9 G# D7 g: s" X& U3 _ F) s& @! ^+ g, K9 j8 b# J3 F
" G; b ^6 D( h B) f |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
