本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
' c9 t; Y& v8 O! G' E6 C% l6 U% w' }
3 Y C2 ]0 f1 W不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
3 @# L+ _/ E, p% D9 I
! P ], V( d2 _8 U$ c* b' J7 q對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說. G- n2 U2 p1 L$ a: M
7 c" U. k+ f; Z1 ?0 q( p% KJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：7 U5 B( c8 U. k& z2 R/ G4 t
8 V0 M1 U7 P" X8 n) pIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
" ^- V9 E7 ~# g! b# @" u0 o( }9 o( S& B+ ?+ x0 j' s
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
: R. d6 `3 D' i
3 P# \9 y* q1 K* v2 {% o5 vSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.$ I. r( y+ s1 H! v1 s9 j
7 ~) d. @& }9 R4 ?: O/ Q3 T
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
3 m7 U, G' ?5 v" H1 |1 h' @順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。 E' E/ A2 c% r9 d* B
4 j+ \% @ s! T: t3 D6 J因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
7 D/ @ h7 {( M2 b/ j8 E* T { S4 Y. z- w' ~; Q" ^" M0 S
6 N. g5 e0 O* t, [/ f4 z1 F
+ i W; n8 O3 x3 E( \! g0 Y. f4 Y6 O+ Z* G% ^
! m/ {: c# m6 b) {% y8 |
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
