本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 1 ~! j; J2 z) ~+ R/ H
- ?% D$ K1 ?8 k9 \不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
- X7 n) G1 M# O$ A
/ ^; j U% `% v對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說7 b) }2 Q5 S- n. f$ Z
! Y' L- [8 |% m/ @' S' ^' d
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
: x. h; ]: |8 U: B" D2 H! [* u) T$ j+ N+ u+ N
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
: }, \$ @& w# \* P$ K5 g2 p, q
+ o( P6 T8 h/ S4 w( `; HRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.$ V$ _9 V7 b _6 e7 r$ U* L$ Z
& t4 g+ j) `) g2 v# O! A( r% @
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
. G( g d8 s0 Z9 `) E. R/ z! v+ \$ e. r' P
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。 M3 `9 C$ H2 T9 K
, H, t; g P! p
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
@( G9 G6 F h+ O4 t' \; E
$ z& D+ z( K6 ^$ x; W, Z1 v) n# ]8 }" `+ s5 r
- x! v/ e, M% @) V
- b* N' T5 _9 C+ J6 a
. `8 s6 @; d$ Y) s, T. O: z# R* r |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
