本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 2 ?, D4 q8 |% s9 R! R( y
) z1 R* K. G- @& Z9 }
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） $ `; o5 V$ S2 C- I& w
& J) Q! H3 R# B) S& Z! k! H對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說: h7 g M7 e$ D9 @ r# w
W) n4 D) o B, H8 V7 ~1 LJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
9 t: T4 `) h& {+ n: i$ @
1 ^6 O; q6 u3 U# W$ LIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
& L7 M+ u0 d$ N3 q; M( T
" v Z- d$ }" S; b" [Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.; g) @' Z" r$ N
$ L, v& e* Y; H* E6 g! Y/ V6 k
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.( A1 L; {' { J
# L0 v; i0 v' ]' \2 ^0 ? fMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
0 a- I) t a& b順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
/ }0 ]1 r$ C q4 [ Z5 s
7 Y0 H F/ k! ^1 \因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。2 K3 m+ r* h6 L
9 ?$ S" d/ I; Y! S
$ a# R5 h4 y) F- h7 E) `- H G: A$ x$ b
1 [! j$ Z3 W" `; Q& ] R4 t2 T; E% G, ^
' N* b# T+ [; d+ v' x
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
