本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 ' \' Y0 L# o2 i7 e8 C$ @
! F* C- C8 S' ?/ @/ t1 n不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
g5 ]" q3 }; A8 q- |" b/ ` e" l8 X% S# \( f
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說$ z6 j8 @! G: V' W+ Q: ~: e
* O: ~! D' P0 t% _' b$ ~% [% s
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：) g% w' b# X, d _/ ~* i) _
6 N1 r( y6 B5 y2 T) y0 [
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.1 P9 f% {$ D1 m
" [7 p0 h! m, sRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
" ?& y, L% ?% w0 s) E6 F, C, {2 u. R9 I3 ^6 e& J7 l0 F/ u
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.8 N T: u& ~; D k; G# r' [
l3 b- x! ~' `" G: F
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
; Q0 d# T9 _0 s! a7 t+ N' l
" |4 c/ j% W- O- U) y8 n因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
/ Y/ L: R' y( E- J0 ~/ O2 t, F2 F2 w. f
6 c- t' U* w3 i' D8 R3 Z5 E
9 p, {3 b; D+ @' U w* g; K
$ p1 u" r$ z) c* B/ Q/ _4 z' \/ ?9 x' n8 n+ {
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
