本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
( t% n: U# F1 @! i6 T: K! Q8 L L* w6 P9 U' y2 ^: s
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） $ |' Q- T5 M5 e1 s
: d- `2 S$ ]7 s3 W% M對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
1 G B! I9 R* c) B. t3 l+ m) l& n" W- w" M
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
3 Y9 `0 r# v% z6 l8 [, O( b: U4 ]7 `他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：. W ?. z7 W; w6 u( h% _
$ C6 M' T- W w6 Z' JIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
G4 }& c4 Y" I" g( _! t: H8 S0 }' }( ?: K" u
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
5 \8 f* H% I$ x! Y
G) e/ }9 ^. \* p3 }' @Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
2 n7 c# c& L, G; e, Q. {( ?! `8 Y3 w& g9 t& C# D6 Q8 A& Q6 s! [7 n
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
6 R* M- H; [# S: l A# z順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
4 \2 v5 L6 A$ l M7 ]1 s& P( G/ c3 ?4 Q# k' }
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
. F9 A# x( T7 @" _' }" a N% J& N( H6 [/ Y/ u- n
6 E! _/ J& s" d; V
% j9 q! Q5 ?+ \7 A* t) V- R
) J; R. L# ^! X( Q# U, U9 N8 N7 [/ e! m" a$ V9 r
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
