本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
0 R2 H7 n: q8 r: ]6 G. o! T8 D2 l" }: @7 Y
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） # a( I! X/ F# n9 L) |
; ^5 \ T5 h% ?6 R8 \" L
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說) t: x" b H; b5 I3 {
" Q6 e/ J5 I6 \" L- y+ G
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
- Y" w. Q9 q4 M; h他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：; `. D4 a5 e3 e# ?* Y6 c/ \1 |. ~
W1 i$ H6 Z R- T+ d; s: N2 M7 y
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
2 }0 a7 p5 o; l3 k$ x7 u
4 u' Y3 t+ J/ ?" |1 c7 v( S( aRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.' N, E, X' x5 m. T# |( z
0 l O# p9 z7 b1 O& V$ s& b+ A9 e) mSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
3 Y: t/ Z6 f2 \. r1 Z6 h s9 z8 t$ z% E
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
3 C. q' u5 f. A5 E3 _) M2 k5 l順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。, u% H2 o2 J/ V# t) j* l3 i; P7 x
Q, Z" E+ ~+ h$ @. E( B: X6 w! b
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
- u# N% B( O2 W( J
3 Q1 d4 v- q, x$ M" r
3 q4 I9 E- m c' X" r8 F% D. j
5 A9 I; \# k+ w6 W$ C2 x
- X4 G* e/ F# k/ x
* m1 X5 L2 ]6 I& N0 W r |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
