本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
" r1 b! ?' C* }" e# u# R) G G- W2 v$ t" e5 u- e8 O
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
3 S8 b Q: Z U, K: k/ V7 V
3 {! \0 c3 Q5 O+ g對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說6 _2 r: ]0 E9 y! y3 X; @) U# q
) y5 [- s7 g) U+ Q$ B" v& [
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：3 I2 k- w& A; {, ]0 b A( s
y. C# t& S+ R! \6 V+ m4 f6 jIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking. w& Z, g! X1 G- t* _) `
( I# R/ `% o+ ^8 a7 U
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.! r9 k5 S1 U, H! Q$ q: T- _5 G- z
3 u9 K7 s6 T, j1 WSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.* V# ^8 |$ G5 _- }
* @- @9 s* n9 e- E: R5 t( C8 E5 O
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
- s1 K8 A& v# ?2 F& f$ X順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。6 a7 s. Y0 Y, ~& t3 F4 @" f' O
* y, |7 {, X7 l2 }因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。! }' N$ g! z' `
8 O$ q0 t0 k( ^3 J9 Z, V
" n5 e: N! W( @! `
3 I5 ~* m8 P" w0 C
: O* g" S: w7 E# a( |# M
! z8 T! B/ J2 n9 q0 D( [ |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
