本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 + |1 m! P6 F w. R9 e
- P9 G% @6 ?# @+ o1 J; N! l& r
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） # V. l' O1 k' }
7 Y g B9 y. t3 {對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
+ R# _+ y' N0 U$ `% z' a
+ [. k5 f. u$ ^- WJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：- {4 V' J; Z5 u: t1 x0 p
0 J3 P9 |+ Z5 F& C' A7 o* s2 Z
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.7 T7 x7 u; g2 s( Q0 s2 L5 g
- H. n1 X4 Y, ?6 C
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.- [; ~& X7 P7 T
; d' ?% j7 P8 M! z& U! S* USuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results., X, |9 K- a+ y0 |& N ~! Y @9 O3 `
, k/ r& a; o! W# e
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
1 @' g: J% R) X2 K* Y9 a6 i3 g' c; I U
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
) s0 P7 d; ?/ Y7 @
( T1 x! H2 S G8 ^9 v, W/ N) x, I9 W
2 Z! Y" b- ]! W. ^5 x; ~
5 c+ V. a V! p- O1 U# s+ C1 r0 e: w' C: l6 }5 N4 j
9 E# |2 L9 I; P) Z, x7 N |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
