本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 / }8 k7 b7 |* I7 U+ t! k9 n
( q( i2 {4 S( h+ I' _不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
" |/ C6 r/ ?+ p- ^% B0 b
" L9 r1 Q$ x w& v7 @對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說6 ?% C" J( M6 r+ b/ ?- A1 R/ }
0 F: ~5 t5 _+ _+ R+ }% p
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
6 P3 P* N4 i& l: v8 ^( \& b他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
7 T- n( a0 W5 v7 w, S; y
0 Q! d1 O# t0 n9 K j& ZIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
4 E# H4 h8 w# C% }# L" T4 o6 Q
; X. x# _; G0 U# U" C; W; nRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
7 D5 b4 t0 R& O
% O) `- F a- e" iSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.9 u) b9 C# U8 N) ^( [; E! B) |7 m
* n. s) i3 `1 |+ i/ o' ?) a1 h
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
( w, l2 {: _! B# f4 T
4 f; r5 w% x, {' t) r因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
2 j7 p n" _7 \; d) v0 ?8 o, |$ |3 L# h: R1 v
/ m' o1 K {& _0 }
3 z6 Q) t# F5 Q& o6 @; Y
8 B: a7 U2 l' [! W# T4 n" |7 \! x6 Q% n! [0 O
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
