本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
6 H: E; g2 n- i7 n' M+ k/ _' q' y; i& ^5 }( c0 Q* T5 L
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
( ?" i9 E' y. } E1 U$ g3 u4 {4 I( U9 X. r
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說& m4 }/ }0 X' e, g B8 T
1 G/ Y7 @9 Z( M* ^( ?
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：6 m' G% W" x9 E6 \
4 _" f, V; G# O7 w5 A! t
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.- d% m) v7 \8 b5 V
' A- `7 p9 p+ kRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
+ t' _. I9 I; ^6 N6 X: M
+ D1 k6 L/ g2 N8 V- t6 u- F* bSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
- P9 J) c! G3 v2 o1 _
3 g* `4 S3 g+ OMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
6 X0 L9 \- \+ v6 Y
$ t7 D' {- x5 A& {# F因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
; k% \! d3 m! { l7 c
. R9 `- i7 R! L3 `6 R$ n3 f6 X+ R2 d$ Y& y4 g
' f# g, U% z! c( Y& p- a
4 m4 y3 c. ?. m' Z6 `" ?" ]) c
/ x0 M3 z4 }0 _) |- K5 \7 P, Q |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
