本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
3 D7 S; r+ y- O" W+ L j7 r! h
) F5 x' c$ Q! ^- E$ y& L/ p9 g不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
6 ^! B7 w1 v% f" D7 S. D8 c/ e4 u. a; q: d. k1 ?) `4 a* H$ h* S
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
s* V, _- O4 e w% s* K5 U6 s4 Q/ X' M/ K" l5 a$ X! X
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：# d0 C, h4 L& X9 d! f
+ }0 B& | h+ y7 N3 t9 S
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
" c1 l! [; s! P% A4 a* \1 C; u. `. t
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.8 l" w/ `' p& I1 Z
1 ^/ F. C0 P3 z f( MSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.: B4 u2 z6 P: n9 m s
H- }1 ^7 B$ Z2 ^/ E) p
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
& n9 {! n, \, K: i8 y順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。; r' G2 o" r" [1 {( g1 d) v
9 D3 L3 y5 M, K9 l2 E( j6 Y, _
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。" _' ?' G/ J, x# ?6 _+ J
6 m1 U0 x! `5 y6 e; r$ y( s$ A) t! |0 F" y; s
+ V2 }9 k1 C) @) x0 D+ }
+ m9 T7 A2 V% _+ C. M, C6 Q' _
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
