本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
7 }7 Z. ]6 P/ t: T# W) \- D8 b9 G) H; _
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
& j. x& F: m2 W6 j# W8 E, e4 E! x) P* P. o7 P$ ^% Q2 \/ f
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說$ T4 u$ d" o& F5 v
: C8 h% K8 I2 j2 D5 q( I
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
) v% A$ f- O. @' p& |- ?' T1 r他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：( l; ~; _6 `1 m% m! h4 U5 `
! M& B, z1 P4 N2 f1 {If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
5 H$ F3 g" ~- k6 q( s% K9 C \3 s+ E% g) S# X% L! w* v
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.9 t# }; J% a9 [( Z% Y" c6 p
% s: r- }: f; c8 O6 p) ~8 TSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
% l: C( ~- c, w- W7 x6 i3 v) E- x! B+ D- K) }
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
% S1 f! f6 s, U2 C( z% ^; g$ K% B順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
( c) R' [! L y# Z$ k
0 V4 F5 Y& V& f ~因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。! A- t, s' O3 P, ^2 f/ f0 }- h
# a5 K* f0 j4 A4 Q% R+ J
- D* w+ K2 r& E: H( A
4 Q ? B/ |2 s/ p2 ~; B Y( H) \' s: h5 u/ | w# U" N5 [& X# z
2 O3 l8 R3 J' i7 [( [ |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
