本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
c) e. C" Q9 K2 R* O" I ^( t) W2 O e0 A- B
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） , o2 a W' V% r6 C/ o" A
3 t* v/ S6 K' \: b b對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
. C) O& ?) V3 P( d B2 x$ G/ i) g M' H* ?6 _ F
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
# M! r9 @6 Q4 J5 B- G% {5 W他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
- P, x/ N9 V9 _0 O5 ~
0 r) G9 ]$ f G2 wIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.. n4 N! _1 T! k2 Z. K* H( \) Q% t! u
. i: ^, Z. H6 q$ {( L. H' W0 j. u
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.2 _3 \) F4 S7 N9 r1 p0 y0 P, B
, \. p* y$ B* p1 N: C4 A9 g( \1 Z
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
/ F8 d+ f7 }9 L6 U
- T* D& k3 @& f4 @; L! _Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
1 v& M, \" l+ o* Z7 ?0 j$ E# O4 T( I5 |+ R
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
. @4 E# y# r5 |' P6 {. N. ~5 g5 S
9 s7 l+ Z, C, ~5 w
' w( |* y* p8 q9 B) ]
8 X, _( b7 i# y. t; J7 |7 S; m
! p' }& o6 K6 e3 E
3 R) E4 c) {, p; F& L4 t1 b |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
