本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
+ j2 H0 ]# t s7 P0 h4 ] s6 D( ~8 L: K; M
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） ) K6 T& V. Q+ [
y& p' }. r/ f) `* t對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
+ b6 F, m- F4 `- z% B; K! i5 @' L$ Y1 K6 ]. u
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：/ c' D. _, ?4 U+ K8 h5 b; F
3 _( e/ z1 m3 s3 \7 E) g/ Z
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
$ N: x7 M: l+ e5 G
$ i a( D$ o4 H5 P& oRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content. r4 c7 X2 x4 k& ]4 @
0 R& ~; h# u& {, i6 R# I2 ~! p% L
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.( {3 a/ ]0 u8 O' C5 |* P+ c0 W* p5 C
9 b2 a# K. I& F" O
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
3 e, b& E8 n) \5 O( ] |' e, F. J順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。& P5 d0 Z7 Y: N+ A! o
. o1 p/ A: I" N& W# F0 U6 q: ^: `
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
. a2 V2 H1 v$ c& } |% N# Y" ?4 W, S4 W" s) J
9 O2 W3 n+ S" g
% i$ w8 Z1 k3 Q: m6 A. p
5 R/ Y. G/ {4 {5 S* u4 ^' [
, z s. J! o8 { |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
