本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 0 `" }0 D0 \7 u4 v5 _
: x1 a2 ?" g0 c' _) ^$ e# h) {$ I D不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） - A* W" H B- \; H5 u( A
; ^& `% T) k! s
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
5 U1 @/ a& u8 n
8 ^/ `/ I. n% P) b, B- ^Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
% i! F+ U; e- c% R3 b4 U9 r$ B7 {; W0 b' }4 ?3 |8 u4 t
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.; h. d ~/ d; q: m" o% Z
. `: v7 @' i* g3 SRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
/ w4 l' Q! R0 _# U) p7 @% l+ h0 ? G% U
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results." f9 ]8 D, c# d/ p
7 c+ m# } _. i6 w* T
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
% J# H1 o/ Y1 ^' I( P/ ~順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
& P! M' x6 }0 S& J8 e3 R# K) n5 A/ `* w
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。0 O9 C9 r: q+ q6 X' v# b/ R
Z1 g4 G# C U5 |3 f+ q
% }# g; l0 m* W W3 l0 o9 }+ _* }
3 p+ w7 J2 F# _, b$ s2 ]/ R9 F* g1 _5 n7 ?
0 }; x: m# x2 K6 J4 I/ m4 J. }
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
